| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/06/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/01/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
PIPONIOT, C.; RÖDIG, E.; PUTZ, F. E.; RUTISHAUSER, E.; SIST, P.; ASCARRUNZ, N.; BLANC, L.; DERROIRE, G.; DESCROIX, L.; GUEDES, M. C.; CORONADO, E. H.; HUTH, A.; KANASHIRO, M.; LICONA, J. C.; FREITAS, L. J. M. de; OLIVEIRA, M. V. N. d'; PEÑA-CLAROS, M.; RODNEY, K.; SHENKIN, A.; SOUZA, C. R. de; VIDAL, E.; WEST, T. A. P.; WORTEL, V.; HÉRAULT, B. |
|
Afiliação: |
Camille Piponiot, CIRAD/Université de Guyane/Université des Antilles/Univ Montpellier; Edna Rödig, UFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany; Francis E Putz, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States of America; Ervan Rutishauser, CarboForExpert, Hermance, Switzerland/Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panamá; Plinio Sist, Cirad, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Nataly Ascarrunz, Instituto Boliviano de Investigación Forestal, Santa Cruz, Bolivia; Lilian Blanc, Cirad, Univ Montpellier, UR Forests and Societies, Montpellier, France; Géraldine Derroire, Cirad,UMREcoFoG (Agroparistech, CNRS, Inra, Université des Antilles, Université de Guyane), Kourou, French Guiana, France; Laurent Descroix, ONF-Guyane, Réserve de Montabo, French Guiana, France; MARCELINO CARNEIRO GUEDES, CPAF-AP; Euridice Honorio Coronado, Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana, Iquitos, Peru; Andreas Huth, UFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany; MILTON KANASHIRO, CPATU; Juan Carlos Licona, Instituto Boliviano de Investigación Forestal, Santa Cruz, Bolivia; LUCAS JOSE MAZZEI DE FREITAS, CPATU; MARCUS VINICIO NEVES D OLIVEIRA, CPAF-AC; Marielos Peña-Claros, Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands; Ken Rodney, Iwokrama, Georgetown, Guyana; Alexander Shenkin, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; CINTIA RODRIGUES DE SOUZA, CPAA; Edson Vidal, Departamento de Ciências Florestais, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo; Thales A. P. West, Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States of America; Verginia Wortel, Forest Management department, CELOS, Paramaribo, Surinam; Bruno Hérault, Cirad, Univ Montpellier,URForests and Societies, Montpellier, France/INP-HB (Institut National Polytechnique Félix Houphouët Boigny), Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire. |
|
Título: |
Can timber provision from Amazonian production forests be sustainable? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Environmental Research Letters, v. 14, n. 6, article 064014, 2019. |
|
DOI: |
10.1088/1748-9326/ab195e |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Supplementary material for this article is available online. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Around 30Mm3 of sawlogs are extracted annually by selective logging of natural production forests in Amazonia, Earth?s most extensive tropical forest. Decisions concerning the management of these production forests will be of major importance for Amazonian forests? fate. To date, no regional assessment of selective logging sustainability supports decision-making. Based on data from 3500 ha of forest inventory plots, our modelling results show that the average periodic harvests of 20m3 ha?1 will not recover by the end of a standard 30 year cutting cycle. Timber recovery within a cutting cycle is enhanced by commercial acceptance of more species and with the adoption of longer cutting cycles and lower logging intensities. Recovery rates are faster in Western Amazonia than on the Guiana Shield. Our simulations suggest that regardless of cutting cycle duration and logging intensities, selectively logged forests are unlikely to meet timber demands over the long term as timber stocks are predicted to steadily decline. There is thus an urgent need to develop an integrated forest resource management policy that combines active management of production forests with the restoration of degraded and secondary forests for timber production. Without better management, reduced timber harvests and continued timber production declines are unavoidable. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Ecosystem recovery; Exploración selectiva; Explotación forestal; Extração seletiva; Manejo florestal; Modelos de simulación; Regeneración natural; Selective logging; Tropical forestry. |
|
Thesagro: |
Administração Florestal; Exploração Florestal; Extração da Madeira; Impacto Ambiental; Madeira Serrada; Modelo de Simulação; Regeneração Natural. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Environmental impact; Forest management; Logging; Lumber; Natural regeneration; Simulation models. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/204774/1/CPAF-AP-2019-Can-timber-provision-from-Amazonian.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03318naa a2200685 a 4500
001 2114232
005 2020-01-14
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1088/1748-9326/ab195e$2DOI
100 1 $aPIPONIOT, C.
245 $aCan timber provision from Amazonian production forests be sustainable?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aSupplementary material for this article is available online.
520 $aAround 30Mm3 of sawlogs are extracted annually by selective logging of natural production forests in Amazonia, Earth?s most extensive tropical forest. Decisions concerning the management of these production forests will be of major importance for Amazonian forests? fate. To date, no regional assessment of selective logging sustainability supports decision-making. Based on data from 3500 ha of forest inventory plots, our modelling results show that the average periodic harvests of 20m3 ha?1 will not recover by the end of a standard 30 year cutting cycle. Timber recovery within a cutting cycle is enhanced by commercial acceptance of more species and with the adoption of longer cutting cycles and lower logging intensities. Recovery rates are faster in Western Amazonia than on the Guiana Shield. Our simulations suggest that regardless of cutting cycle duration and logging intensities, selectively logged forests are unlikely to meet timber demands over the long term as timber stocks are predicted to steadily decline. There is thus an urgent need to develop an integrated forest resource management policy that combines active management of production forests with the restoration of degraded and secondary forests for timber production. Without better management, reduced timber harvests and continued timber production declines are unavoidable.
650 $aEnvironmental impact
650 $aForest management
650 $aLogging
650 $aLumber
650 $aNatural regeneration
650 $aSimulation models
650 $aAdministração Florestal
650 $aExploração Florestal
650 $aExtração da Madeira
650 $aImpacto Ambiental
650 $aMadeira Serrada
650 $aModelo de Simulação
650 $aRegeneração Natural
653 $aEcosystem recovery
653 $aExploración selectiva
653 $aExplotación forestal
653 $aExtração seletiva
653 $aManejo florestal
653 $aModelos de simulación
653 $aRegeneración natural
653 $aSelective logging
653 $aTropical forestry
700 1 $aRÖDIG, E.
700 1 $aPUTZ, F. E.
700 1 $aRUTISHAUSER, E.
700 1 $aSIST, P.
700 1 $aASCARRUNZ, N.
700 1 $aBLANC, L.
700 1 $aDERROIRE, G.
700 1 $aDESCROIX, L.
700 1 $aGUEDES, M. C.
700 1 $aCORONADO, E. H.
700 1 $aHUTH, A.
700 1 $aKANASHIRO, M.
700 1 $aLICONA, J. C.
700 1 $aFREITAS, L. J. M. de
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. V. N. d'
700 1 $aPEÑA-CLAROS, M.
700 1 $aRODNEY, K.
700 1 $aSHENKIN, A.
700 1 $aSOUZA, C. R. de
700 1 $aVIDAL, E.
700 1 $aWEST, T. A. P.
700 1 $aWORTEL, V.
700 1 $aHÉRAULT, B.
773 $tEnvironmental Research Letters$gv. 14, n. 6, article 064014, 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amapá (CPAF-AP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Catálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Trigo. |
|
Identificador: |
69 |
|
Data corrente: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/04/2015 |
|
Código do título: |
0900016 |
|
ISSN: |
0301-2123 |
|
Código CCN: |
000690-4 |
|
Título e Subtítulo: |
ACTA BIOLOGICA PARANAENSE |
|
Entidade: |
Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Federal do Parana |
|
Local de publicação: |
Curitiba, PR |
|
Periodicidade: |
Irregural |
|
Inicio de publicação: |
1972 |
|
Coleções da unidade: |
Embrapa Florestas
1972 1(1/2,3/4); 1975 4(1/2,3/4); 1976 5(3/4); 1983 12(1/4); 1985 14(1/4); 1986 15(1/4); 1987 16(1/4); 1988 17(1/4); 1989 18(1/4); 1990 19(1/4); 1991 20(1/4); 1992 21(1/4); 1994 23(1/4); 1995 24(1/4); 1996 25(1/4); 1997 26(1/4); 1998 27(1/4); 1999 28(1/4); 2000 29(1/4); 2001 30(1/4); 2002 31(1/4); 2003 32(1/4); 2004 33(1/4); 2005 34(1/4); 2006 35(1/2,3/4); 2007 36(1/2,3/4); 2008 37(1/2,3/4); 2009 38(1/2,3/4); 2010 39(1/2,3/4); 2011 40(1/2,3/4); 2012 41(1/2,3/4)
Embrapa Meio Ambiente
1972/2012 1(1/2); 4 (1/2,3/4); 5(1/2,3/4); 6(1/4); 8; 7(1/4); 8(1/4); 9(1/4); 10(1/4); 11(1/4); 12(1/4); 13(1/4); 14(1/4); 15(1/4); 16(1/4); 17(1/4); 18(1/4); 19(1/4); 20(1/4); 21(1/4); 22(1/4); 23(1/4); 24(1/4); 25(1/4); 26(1/4); 27(1/4); 28(1/4); 29(1/4); 30(1/4); 31(1/4); 32(1/4); 33(1/4); 34(1/4); 35(1/2, 3/4); 36(1/4); 37(1/4); 38(1/4); 39(1/4); 40(1/4); 41(1/4)
Embrapa Meio-Norte
1972 1(1/2); 1985-2008 14-38; 2011 40(1-4); 2012 41(1/4)
Classificação: 574.05
Embrapa Trigo
1972/91 1 1972; 2 1973; 3 1974; 4 1975; 5 1976; 6 1977; 7 1978; 8 1979; 9 1980; 10 1981; 11 1982; 12 1983; 13 1984; 14 1985; 15 1986; 16 1987; 18 1989; 19 1990; 20 1991; 28(1-4) 1999.
Classificação: 574.05 |
|
Fechar
|
|
|
